Blogs fit in Dalzell’s “free trade of ideas” because anyone can publish a blog and express their feelings on it, but as the University of Oregan proved, not all information on blogs is the truth.
After a university employee was told to remove a “Support the Troops” sticker from his truck - state policy prohibits personal stickers on state vehicles - bloggers accused the university of banning statements of support for the military. UO President Dave Frohnmayer said the accusations were untrue.
“The danger in blogging is that there isn’t that level of checking,” said John Russial, an associate professor in the University of Oregon School of Journalism and Communication. “Information can get out there and it can be spread like wildfire, when in fact it might not be true.”
Journalism is a source of information people go to… to get the facts… the truth… the real news. People view journalists as professionals, but even Matt Drudge, of the “Drudge Report”, proved that one does not have to be educated to get the news out. Blogs are now becomming a source of news. They not only tell the news, but depending on the contributor, give an opinion as well.
Blogger information can be suspect, but the practice is on the rise, and traditional news organizations are watching the “blogosphere” more closely, looking for story ideas, Russial said.
Some journalists criticize bloggers as poor reporters, but others see bloggers as valuable watchdogs.
“Blogs have formed to monitor individual newsrooms and even certain journalists,” wrote Kelly McBride, of The Poynter Institute. “In response, journalists will get better and tougher.”
Bloggers can develop credibility the same way that traditional news organizations do, by building a reputation for accuracy, Russial said.
The more blogs become used, the more they will be accepted. Bloggers need to make sure all of their information is true and credible in order to continue posting their blogs.